Skip to main content

A Mini Oasis

Adam Grant tweeted:


And it hit me: If the bosses were being problematic and the toxic culture somehow spilled into my workplace (which is physically not in the same place as the top management office), it is NOT my job to fix it. My job is to protect and support my team, not hope or try to change the bosses' attitude. If the bosses somehow have other (boring) priorities, I can voice out my opinion and just accept it when they denied my request. 

I was only 30 when I took up this manager post. I did not have any prior experience as a manager and I always tried my best to please the bosses. I only took the post because I was looking for challenge. I thought that winning each battle was the top priority. I only changed after I enrolled in MBA, especially after learning about organizational behaviour. As fate has it, in this department there was an MBA program for medical officers interested in management. I started my course and fell head over heels in love with it. I graduated with a 3.98 CGPA which now I have no idea what to do with it. (Please do not let my lecturers find this post lol).

Okay back to the tweet.

Adam Grant's tweet made me realize that within a toxic working environment, it is possible (and totally acceptable!) to create a mini oasis within the dry desert. If the manager at a certain level of organization, can shield the team from the toxic spill from above, he or she is already doing a good job. A working environment can actually differ within the same organization as units and sub-units exist. 

Toxic leadership need not define each level of organization. As a leader, no matter how small your team is, you have a role to play in constructing the working environment. A workplace far from the toxic headquarter or a mobile team is an added advantage.

The tweet can also be viewed from the eyes of being a member of a family. After all, a family is also an organization with different units and sub-units. If the older generations refused to change or adapt their ways to the current situation, it is the parents' duties to protect their children against any negativity from them. If the parents are the source of toxicity, the siblings can protect each other. In Asian culture, voicing out difference or simply just speaking up is considered disrespectful. Therefore, most of us just stay silent when being berated by older people. So, it is helpful to remember that our responsibility is not to fix the negativity, but only to protect our loved ones from it.


Realizing your limits and prioritizing the people you love while you are battling the constant challenges in life are important. At times, we forgot the things that matter. Nowhere is perfect in this world. We only try our best to make the best out of what is given to us.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Here Is Eid of 2025

Eid is about winning - the celebration for Muslims who succeeded in conquering their worldly wants and ego during Ramadhan. But it does not always feel like a happy occasion for some. I had a very interesting Eid this year (maybe because I took leave for one whole week and accidentally became the main adult in the house 😒) My beloved grandmother passed away in 2020 on the evening of the first day of Eid. She was our matriarch, and it was hard adjusting to our lives without her. Eid and Ramadhan were always her thing - she would plan all the meals and celebrations, the house visits, the guests' schedules and all the other important stuff. We all miss her, of course: my parents, my aunts and uncles, my siblings, my children, my cousins, and all those who knew her. But I think that hiding in grief would be an insult to her memory. She was always someone who was welcoming whenever guests were over - nothing made her happier than meeting her relatives and friends and making sure they h...

"Chronic": Creating Change and Space For Those Deemed Unchangeable

These past few months, we handled 2 cases of employees with chronic conditions that felt like they were mistreated. One complained that her medical leave certificate was rejected, and another complained that she was unfairly transferred out of her department.  As we dived into the cases, I noticed that some managers tend to not have the courtesy, or should I say, bravery , to take the lead in discussing the chronic conditions together with the employees. Some managers just take the chronic condition at face value, some did not even bother to actually confirm the condition and just accept rumours, and not doing anything to help. Of course, it is understandable to think that by acknowledging the condition, the employees may "bully" the managers to get what they want. But, some employees with chronic conditions may actually need genuine help, and we may miss this group of people. Having a chronic medical condition, be it physical or mental, is not something someone wishes upon t...

10 Years: The First Step - The Cynefin Framework

During a recent read, I learned about the Cynefin Framework: (Source: HBR article here ) I think this is an interesting framework. It helps me to categorize each conflict and how best to first approach it. The framework arranges the steps in order of priority for each category.  There are four areas in which I can classify a problem which I am facing: Simple, Chaos, Complicated, Complex and Disorder. In each area, except for Disorder, the responses are arranged in the order in which one we should do first.  Simple problems are problems which we have faced before and we have already formed a strategy to solve previously, which are our "Best Practice". In facing a Simple problem, we first have to sense it, which means recognizing it as a problem that we have a strategy for. We then categorize the problem to respond to it with our Best Practice. For example, in an outpatient clinic, a patient comes with fever and the doctor senses and categorizes the fever and responds with a tr...